Related Notices
9/25/2025 NSF Malign Foreign Talent Program Added as PI Certification
11/07/2025 NSF Research Security Training and Review Prior to Submission Requirement
11/25/2025 NSF Submission Requirements Starting in December 2025
2/6/2026 NSF PAPPG Supplement 26-2
Current Notice
NSF has released a policy supplement NSF 26-200 to PAPPG NSF 24-1, effective December 8, 2025, which takes precedence over existing guidance for all NSF grants and cooperative agreements awarded on or after this date. The changes align with federal priorities (including a new Executive Order on grant oversight) and update multiple sections of the current version of the PAPPG. The NSF is deferring the release of PAPPG 26-1 while the OMB updates the Uniform Guidance.
Supplement NSF 26-200
Policy revisions
The following revisions, organized by PAPPG chapter, follow:
- SBIR/STTR Project Pitch Submissions (Chapter I.D)
- SBIR/STTR Project Pitch formally added as a proposal type; a Project Pitch invitation is now required before submitting SBIR/STTR Phase I or Fast-Track proposals.
- Tribal Organization Terminology (Chapter I.E)
- Terminology updated to “Indian Tribes” and clarified to better cover Native-owned lands.
- Proposer Limitations – Confucius Institutes (Chapter I.E)
- Confucius Institute restriction: NSF cannot fund IHEs that maintain a contract/agreement with a Confucius Institute. UCSF does not have a contract/agreement with a Confucius Institute.
- Allowable and Unallowable Costs – American Drone Security Act (Chapter II.D)
- American Security Drone Act: NSF funds cannot be used (after Dec 22, 2025) to buy or operate drones from certain “covered foreign entities”. This is being reviewed for guidance.
- Data Management and Sharing Plans (Chapter II.D)
- All data supporting NSF-funded publications must be publicly shared at the time of publication, with any exceptions justified in the DMS Plan. This is being reviewed for guidance to campus.
- Proposal Specific Revision Thresholds (Chapter II.F)
- Funding caps raised:
- Planning proposal: up to $200,000 TC/year (was $100k)
- RAPID proposal: up to $300,000 TC (was $200k)
- EAGER proposal: up to $400,000 TC (was $300k)
- Planning proposal: up to $200,000 TC/year (was $100k)
- Funding caps raised:
Minimum Number of Reviewers (Chapter III.B)
- Full proposals must be reviewed by at least two reviewers (one may be an internal NSF staff member).
- Proposal Not Accepted or Returned Without Review (Chapter IV.B)
- Proposals without sufficient content to permit effective merit review may be returned without review.
SBIR Phase II Reconsiderations (Chapter IV.D)
- Reconsideration is no longer available for SBIR/STTR Phase II proposals.
- Foreign Financial Disclosure Report (Chapter VII.D)
- Certain higher-ed recipients must annually report foreign financial support from countries of concern, at the institutional main campus UEI level.
- Financial Requirements and Payments (Chapter VIII)
- Emphasis on electronic remittances and clarified handling of unexpended program income
- Research Security (Chapter IX.C)
- New research security requirements and documentation expectations are added by reference to NSF Important Notice 149, including training and assessment obligations.
- Equipment-Related Thresholds (Chapter IX.E)
- Equipment threshold for possible federal title claim increased from $5,000 to $10,000 to align with the CFR.
Property Management Requirements for Federally Owned Property (Chapter IX.E)
- Expanded property management requirements for federally owned property
- Use of NSF’s Central Property Inventory Repository (CPIR)
- Annual and final inventory reports for Federally Owned Property ≥ $10,000 conducted every 2 years
- Biennial physical inventories.
- Use of NSF’s Central Property Inventory Repository (CPIR)
- Expanded property management requirements for federally owned property
- Scientific Integrity (Chapter XI.M)
- Scientific integrity section revised to align with NSF Gold Standard Science framework by removing inclusivity.
- Research Misconduct (Chapter XII.C)
- Research misconduct definition now explicitly includes misuse of AI-based tools in fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism.